Acute aortic syndrome comprises several life-threatening aortic conditions that present similarly but have differing pathologic, demographic, and survival characteristics; it includes aortic dissection, intramural hemorrhage, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
Male individuals older than 40 years with hypertension and individuals younger than 40 years with Marfan syndrome or bicuspid aortic valve are at highest risk
Characteristic symptoms include very abrupt onset of chest pain usually described as sharp, tearing, or ripping. Pain may radiate to neck, back, or abdomen, depending on location of aortic damage
CT angiography is usually the diagnostic test of choice, although transesophageal echocardiography or MRI can be used depending on patient characteristics and facility capabilities
Initial management includes immediate surgical consultation and urgent reduction of heart rate to 60 beats per minute or less and reduction of blood pressure to 120 mm Hg or less (systolic) with IV β-blockers
Type A dissection (and intramural hemorrhage and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of ascending aorta) is typically managed surgically
Type B dissection (and intramural hemorrhage and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of descending aorta) can be managed conservatively (treatment of hypertension) or surgically, depending on clinical findings
Patients with acute aortic syndrome need lifelong antihypertensive therapy and surveillance aortic imaging
Urgent Action
Obtain emergent surgical consultation for type A dissection; expedite transfer to higher-level facility if indicated r1
Decrease stress on aortic wall by decreasing heart rate and blood pressure
Begin IV β-blocker to decrease heart rate to 60 beats per minute or less; add nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker if needed to reach this goal
After heart rate is controlled, begin vasodilators to decrease systolic blood pressure to 120 mm Hg or less; nitroprusside is commonly used
Administer IV narcotic analgesic for pain
Pitfalls
Always consider aortic dissection as a cause of chest pain, particularly for pain that radiates to upper back or abdomen or that is described as tearing or ripping
Missed or delayed diagnosis is usually due to an incorrect working diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome r2
Patients with an intermediate-risk profile for acute aortic syndrome who are being evaluated for a possible acute coronary syndrome (but without clear-cut ST-elevation myocardial infarction) should have aortic imaging before being given antiplatelet and antithrombin agents r3
Myocardial infarction can coexist with aortic dissection
CT, MRI, and transesophageal echocardiography are all accurate diagnostic modalities, but false-negative results do occur
Diagnosis cannot be excluded definitively on the basis of results from a single imaging study. If first aortic imaging findings are negative, strongly consider obtaining a second imaging study if there is high clinical suspicion
Terminology
Clinical Clarification
Acute aortic syndrome comprises several life-threatening aortic conditions that present similarly but have differing pathologic, demographic, and survival characteristics r4r5
Includes aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer r5r6
Aortic dissection: disruption of medial layer provoked by intramural bleeding, usually from an intimal tear. This results in separation of aortic wall layers and subsequent formation of true lumen and false lumen with or without communication r7
Aortic intramural hematoma: hematoma develops in media of aortic wall in absence of false lumen and intimal tearr7(definition is controversial; intramural hematoma may be aortic dissection with thrombosis of false lumen)r5
Accounts for up to 25% of acute aortic syndrome
Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer: ulceration of an aortic atherosclerotic plaque penetrating through internal elastic lamina into media;r7localized to descending thoracic aorta in more than 90% of casesr3
Dissection originates in ascending aorta and propagates distally at least to aortic arch and typically to descending aorta
Type II
Dissection originates in and is confined to ascending aorta
Type III
Dissection originates in descending aorta and propagates distally
Diagnosis
Clinical Presentation
History
Earlier medical history is significant; known aortic aneurysm, congenital heart disease, connective tissue disease, hypertension, and previous surgical or catheter-based cardiac procedure increase likelihood of acute aortic syndrome c1c2c3c4c5
Seek history of stimulant drug use (eg, cocaine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methamphetamine) c6
Symptom onset is sudden and rapid
Clinical symptoms do not allow distinction between acute aortic syndrome types and other acute pathologic conditions
For all types of acute aortic syndrome, broad range of nonspecific symptoms is possible, depending on location of dissection, degree of extension, presence of vascular branch (and end-organ) involvement, and presence of rupture
May present with syncope (15% with type A; less than 5% with type B) r7c15
Other symptoms reflect ischemic end-organ dysfunction caused by extension of dissection to branch arteries
Diffuse abdominal pain is present in about 21% of type A cases and about 43% of type B cases r3c16
Flank pain and decreased urine output are likely if renal artery is involved in dissection c17c18
Dyspnea and orthopnea are likely if ischemic congestive heart failure is present or if left ventricular failure results from aortic rupture into left atrium c19c20
Symptoms of stroke are likely if carotid artery is involved
Lower extremity numbness and pain are likely if dissection extends to iliac arteries (with paraplegia if spinal arteries are not perfused) c21c22c23
Rarely, hemoptysis is caused by rupture into tracheobronchial tree c24
Rarely, hematemesis is caused by rupture into esophagus c25
Intramural hematoma
Patient is more likely to be older and more likely to be female than in aortic dissection r5
Presents with pain similar to that of aortic dissection r5c26c27
Patient is more likely to be an older male individual and more likely to have known coronary artery disease or risk factors for atherosclerotic disease than in aortic dissection r7c29c30
Presents with pain similar to that of aortic dissection r3r5c31c32
Rarely presents with symptoms of dissection-related lack of organ perfusion
Pulse deficit (apical versus radial) is present in about 18% of type A cases and about 9% of type B cases r8c38
Pressure differential (interarm blood pressure difference) greater than 20 mm Hg is suggestive (although studies differ on its significance) r9c39
Compare carotid and femoral arteries
Aortic insufficiency murmur (early diastolic decrescendo murmur heard best in the left third intercostal space) is present in about 44% of type A cases and about 12% of type B cases r8c40
Signs of congestive heart failure (eg, rales, S₃ gallop) are present in about 9% of type A cases and about 3% of type B cases r8c41c42
Cool, pale lower extremities with decreased or absent pulses are likely if iliac and femoral arteries are involved c43c44c45c46
Neurologic examination
Signs of stroke are present in about 6% of type A cases and about 2% of type B cases r8
Hemiparesis is likely if spinal artery malperfusion is present c47
Hoarseness (from laryngeal nerve compression) may occur c48
Causes and Risk Factors
Causes
Often multifactorial; most common factors include uncontrolled hypertension and inherited susceptibility r4
Elevated systolic pressure can propagate an aortic dissection c50
Physical exertion or emotional stress is direct precursor of pain in two-thirds of aortic dissection events; both involve acute changes in blood pressure r11c51c52
Incidence rises with age; mean age at presentation is 63 years r8c67
Age at presentation is often lower in patients with Marfan syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve, or history of previous aortic surgery r3c68
Case reports of aortic dissection in children as young as 3 years r3
Sex
Over two-thirds of aortic dissection events occur in male individuals r11c69c70
Female individuals have higher mortality rates from aortic dissection than male individuals r15c71c72
Genetics
Marfan syndrome: heterozygous mutation in the FBN1 gene (fibrillin 1; OMIM *134797)r16 on chromosome band 15q21 (phenotype is OMIM #154700)r17c73
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV: heterozygous mutation in the COL3A1 gene (collagen type III alpha 1 chain; OMIM *120180)r18 on chromosome band 2q32 (phenotype is OMIM #130050)r19c74
Loeys-Dietz syndrome type 2: heterozygous mutation in the TGFBR2 gene (transforming growth factor beta receptor 2; OMIM *190182)r20 on chromosome band 3p22 (phenotype is OMIM #610168)r21c75
Confers increased risk of aortic dissection; has been described in the range of 5- to 10-fold increased risk, although the true multiple is uncertain r22r23
History and physical examination findings suggest the diagnosis, but a high index of suspicion is necessary given overlap with more common conditions r4c95
Best predictors are:
Abruptness of chest pain
Tearing or ripping quality of pain with migration
History of hypertension
Pulse deficit
Focal neurologic deficits
Consider risk scoring to determine pretest probability of acute aortic syndrome to direct testing strategy r25
2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelinesr3 recommend the use of an algorithm that includes initial evaluation using ADD-RS (Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score); however, a 2015 clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physiciansr9 notes several limitations to this score, in particular, noting that it was found to be insufficient at excluding the diagnosis of aortic dissection
High-risk history includes known aortic aneurysm or aortic valve disease, connective tissue diseases (eg, Marfan syndrome), familial or genetic aortic aneurysm/dissection syndromes, and recent surgical manipulation of aorta (surgical or catheter-based)
High-risk pain features and physical signs include:
Abrupt onset of severe sharp or ripping chest/back/abdominal pain
Presence of pulse deficit
Blood pressure differential of more than 20 mm Hg between limbs
Obtain urgent definitive aortic imaging (without waiting for chest radiograph) for all high-risk patients; if first aortic image finding is negative, obtain second imaging study for all high-risk patients or when suspicion is otherwise high r3
CT angiography is diagnostic test of choice for most patients with high-risk features r3r26c96
Transesophageal echocardiography can be performed at bedside in hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected type A disease in whom CT is not feasible r3c97
Transthoracic echocardiography has lower sensitivity to identify acute aortic syndromes compared to other modalities and is not considered definitive imaging
Magnetic resonance angiography is an additional option if immediately available r3c98
Order chest radiograph for all patients who are at low or intermediate risk, primarily to identify other causes of chest pain, which may obviate the need for definitive aortic imaging r3c99
If dilated aorta or widened mediastinum is seen, proceed to definitive aortic imaging; chest radiograph alone is not sufficiently sensitive or specific for diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome
For patients at intermediate risk, proceed to definitive aortic imaging after chest radiograph if no alternative cause of symptoms has been identified
For patients at low risk, consider definitive aortic imaging if clinical scenario is suggestive and no alternative explanation for symptoms has been identified
Consider D-dimer testing, although do not use a specific result to direct further testing or treatment r27c100
European Society of Cardiology guidelinesr7 recommend obtaining D-dimer level; a negative result in a patient with pretest low-risk status decreases likelihood of aortic dissection r28
American College of Emergency Physicians guidelinesr9 and 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelinesr3 do not recommend routine D-dimer testing
Additional testing is not diagnostic for acute aortic syndrome, but it is directed at differential diagnosis, identification of complications, and expediting time to surgery (for high-risk patients)
European Society of Cardiology guidelinesr7 suggest the following be obtained routinely: CBC and levels of creatinine, AST, ALT, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate, and blood gases c103c104c105c106c107c108c109c110c111
Obtain presurgical laboratory testing for all high-risk patients, including CBC, coagulation tests, serum chemistry, and blood type and screen r3c112c113c114c115
Elevated D-dimer level, especially in the first hour, increases suspicion of aortic dissection, but should not be considered diagnostic for aortic dissection r7r29
D-dimer level increases precipitously in aortic dissection compared with other disorders, in which the D-dimer level increases gradually r7
Low D-dimer level is associated with decreased probability, but more research is needed; not recommended as screening toolr3r9
Order chest radiograph for all patients who are at low or intermediate risk, primarily to identify other causes of chest pain, which may obviate the need for definitive aortic imaging
Other diagnostic tools
Can be used in addition to risk category scores
ADD-RS
1 point for risk factor (Marfan syndrome, family history of aortic disease, recent aortic condition or procedure)
1 point for pain feature
1 point for clinical exam feature
ADD-RS alone or when combined with D-dimer testing may be useful to determine whether to proceed with imaging
Chest pain is usually the primary symptom in both scenarios; it is more likely to be of very abrupt onset and described as knife-like or tearing with acute aortic syndrome
Pulse differential and interarm blood pressure differential are unlikely in myocardial infarction
ECG may not always be helpful. Dissection-related coronary artery malperfusion may present with ECG changes that are indistinguishable from those of primary myocardial ischemia r3
Differentiate with immediate definitive aortic imaging (usually CT angiography) if patient is at intermediate or high risk for acute aortic syndrome
Myocardial infarction can coexist with aortic dissection, often as a complication thereof
May present with similar symptoms (eg, chest pain, dyspnea, syncope), although character of pain is more likely to be pleuritic with pulmonary embolism. Dyspnea may be a prominent symptom with pulmonary embolism
D-dimer level is elevated in both conditions; it typically rises faster (within first few hours) with aortic dissection, but it is not diagnostically helpful for differentiation
Usually presents with dyspnea and sudden onset of ipsilateral chest pain described most commonly as pleuritic rather than tearing
Physical examination may suggest the diagnosis, with ipsilateral decreased breath sounds, absence of tactile fremitus, and hyperresonance to percussion; cyanosis, hypotension, and tracheal deviation are usually present in tension pneumothorax
Differentiate with posteroanterior chest radiograph, which shows loss of lung markings in periphery and a pleural line that runs parallel to chest wall
Usually presents with acute onset of severe periumbilical pain disproportionate to physical examination findings, as opposed to pain of acute aortic dissection, which begins in chest and back and involves radiation of pain as dissection progresses
Patients with both conditions often have known cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease
May occur as isolated event (usually due to thrombosis or emboli) or may occur secondary to aortic dissection extending to branch arteries off of abdominal aorta
Differentiate the 2 conditions with CT angiography, imaging the complete abdominal aorta and abdominal branch arteries
Presents with pain typically limited to abdomen in contrast to pain of acute aortic syndrome, which usually begins in chest and/or back
Patients with perforated peptic ulcer usually have rigid abdomen and remain motionless with pain; those with aortic dissection usually do not have rigid abdomen and often writhe in pain
Erect chest radiograph shows subdiaphragmatic air in perforated peptic ulcer
Differentiate acute aortic syndrome from perforated peptic ulcer with CT angiography if there is diagnostic uncertainty
Treatment
Goals
In acute phase, decrease stress on aortic wall by reducing heart rate and blood pressure r33r34
Reduce heart rate to goal of 60 beats per minute or less (using β-blocker or nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker) r3
After reducing heart rate, reduce blood pressure to goal of 120 mm Hg or less (systolic) using vasodilators (to lowest blood pressure that maintains adequate end-organ perfusion) r3
Manage pain
Correctly categorize type of acute aortic syndrome and treat appropriately to prevent propagation of dissection and other life-threatening complications
Disposition
Admission criteria
Criteria for ICU admission
If not taken directly to surgery from emergency department, patients with acute aortic syndrome are admitted to ICU for the following: r34
Intensive monitoring of vital signs
IV medication delivery
Preparatory staging for surgery or interventional radiology procedure
Obtain immediate urgent consult with cardiovascular surgeon upon diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome
Treatment Options
For all patients (with any cause, whether type A or B dissection, intramural hemorrhage, or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer)
Manage blood pressure, heart rate, and pain
If heart rate and/or blood pressure are higher than goal (more than 60 beats per minute or more than 120 mm Hg, respectively):
Use medical therapy, first to decrease heart rate to 60 beats per minute or less, and then to reduce and maintain systolic blood pressure at 120 mm Hg or less r3
Begin therapy with IV β-blocker (eg, esmolol, labetalol, metoprolol) r3
Use cautiously in the setting of acute aortic insufficiency; compensatory tachycardia will be blocked r3
Use verapamil or diltiazem if β-blockers are ineffective (or patient is intolerant of β-blockade) r3
For β-blocker–intolerant patients, verapamil or diltiazem may be used to reduce heart rate or to reduce blood pressure without causing reflex tachycardia r35
Use cautiously in the setting of acute aortic insufficiency; compensatory tachycardia will be blocked r3
Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are not recommended in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction due to negative inotropic effects r36
Add sodium nitroprusside (most commonly used), ACE inhibitor, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (eg, nicardipine, clevidipine), or other vasodilator to β-blocker if blood pressure goal is not achieved r3
Shock usually mandates immediate operative intervention r3
Begin resuscitation as follows:
Administer 1 or more fluid boluses titrated to improvement of blood pressure, aiming for euvolemia r3
If condition is unresponsive, begin IV vasopressors (eg, norepinephrine, phenylephrine); avoid inotropes, if possible, because they increase stress on aortic wall r3
For patients with hemopericardium and cardiac tamponade who cannot survive until surgery, consider performing pericardiocentesis, withdrawing just enough fluid to restore perfusion r3
Manage pain with IV opioids
Determine definitive therapy (surgical versus medical) r2r34
For type A dissection, proceed to surgery or expedite transfer to more appropriate facility; mortality risk increases 1% to 2% every hour of delay until surgery r3r37
For type B dissection, definitive treatment is less clear r3r38r39
Medical management of hypertension is appropriate in most cases, with surgical intervention (usually an endovascular procedure) indicated for the following complications:
Uncontrolled hypertension
Refractory pain
Aortic rupture
Hypotension or shock
Malperfusion of limbs or viscera
Although it is controversial, some surgeons recommend endovascular aortic repair for cases with type B dissection that they consider uncomplicated r40r41
Aim is prophylaxis against later dissection-related complications
For intramural hemorrhage and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
If the damage involves the ascending aorta, high mortality occurs with medical treatment alone; treatment is usually surgical r3
If the damage involves the descending aorta, blood pressure control is the primary treatment in many cases, but surgery (especially endovascular repair) is increasingly being used r42
Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer diameter more than 15 mm is associated with high risk for disease progression; consider early surgical intervention r43
Persistent pain, hemodynamic instability, or increase in ulcer/hematoma size requires early surgical intervention r42
Maintain effective blood pressure and heart rate control after discharge
Convert to oral formulations of antihypertensives and ensure adequate follow-up r7
Goal for chronic hypertension
Less than 140/90 mm Hg (European aortic diseases guideline) r7
Less than 140/90 mm Hg (patients without diabetes) or less than 130/80 mm Hg (patients with diabetes or chronic renal disease) (American aortic diseases guideline) r3
Lower blood pressure targets may be beneficial
Optimal outpatient medical regimen for type B dissection managed conservatively needs further study; aim is to prevent aortic enlargement and aneurysm r7
For patients with Marfan syndrome, β-blockers are recommended; angiotensin receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors reduce progression of aortic dilation r7
Advise all patients with aortic disease to avoid competitive and body contact sports and strenuous activities that would require the Valsalva maneuver (eg, isometric heavy weightlifting, shoveling snow, chopping wood); low resistance exercise that avoids straining is generally considered acceptable except in cases of severe aortic dilatation r7
Esmolol Hydrochloride Solution for injection; Adults: 500 to 1,000 mcg/kg IV over 1 minute, then 50 mcg/kg/minute continuous IV infusion, initially. Repeat bolus and titrate by 50 mcg/kg/minute until goal blood pressure is attained. Max: 200 mcg/kg/minute.
Labetalol Hydrochloride Solution for injection; Adults: 10 to 20 mg IV, then 20 to 80 mg IV every 10 to 30 minutes until goal blood pressure is attained. Max cumulative dose: 300 mg.
Used in conjunction with β-blocker to offset tachycardia caused by nitroprusside
Sodium Nitroprusside Solution for injection; Adults: 0.3 to 0.5 mcg/kg/minute continuous IV infusion, initially. Titrate by 0.5 mcg/kg/minute every 5 minutes until desired effect or blood pressure cannot be further reduced without compromising organ perfusion. Max: 10 mcg/kg/minute for 10 minutes.
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (indicated as vasodilator for hypertension) c131
Clevidipine
Clevidipine Emulsion for injection; Adults: 1 to 2 mg/hour continuous IV infusion, initially. Double dose every 90 seconds until the blood pressure approaches goal, then increase by less than double every 5 to 10 minutes as needed. Max: 32 mg/hour or 1,000 mL/24 hours due to lipid load restrictions. Max duration: 72 hours.
Nicardipine Hydrochloride Solution for injection; Adults: 5 mg/hour continuous IV infusion, initially. Titrate by 2.5 mg/hour every 5 to 15 minutes until goal blood pressure is attained. Max: 15 mg/hour. Reduce to 3 mg/hour after response achieved.
Dissected aortic section is removed and is replaced with synthetic graft
Some patients may require additional immediate reconstruction owing to nature of dissection
Aortic valve revision or replacement
Coronary artery bypass grafting
Techniques such as hypothermic circulatory arrest and perfusion of the head vessels are often used during surgery
Indication
Type A dissection
Complicated type B dissection that cannot be managed medically and for which an endovascular approach is not appropriate
Complications
Operative mortality rate is now less than 18% for type A dissection r44r45
Early surgical treatment of patients with acute type A dissection involved mortality between 28% and 58%. Despite continuous advances in diagnostic methods, operative technique, and perioperative care, acute type A dissection remains a major unsolved cardiovascular surgical challenge, as illustrated by the most recent International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection report showing an 18% operative mortality in a contemporary cohort (2010-2013) r45
Stent is inserted through catheters inserted into femoral artery
Balloon is inserted, covering primary entry tear and restoring blood flow into true lumen
Prevents further enlargement and eventual aortic rupture
Indication
Appropriate for selected patients with type B dissection, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of descending aorta, and intramural hematoma of descending aorta
Aspiration of pericardial fluid, ideally under real-time ultrasonographic or fluoroscopic guidance. In the emergency setting, performed without such guidance
Patient is placed in supine or semirecumbent position with continuous ECG monitoring; anesthesia is usually local
Spinal needle is advanced through subxiphoid skin toward left shoulder or suprasternal notch. Needle is further advanced blindly (in emergency) or with ECG connector attached to the hub while negative pressure is applied to syringe. A pop is usually felt when puncture of pericardium occurs
When blood or pericardial fluid is aspirated or cardiac pulsations are felt, a syringe is attached to the needle and pericardial fluid is withdrawn
ECG changes suggesting pericardial penetration (increased P-wave amplitude, ST-segment elevation, or ectopic beats) indicate the need to withdraw needle slightly in 1- to 2-mm increments until the changes disappear
Indication
Cardiac tamponade
Contraindications
Anticoagulation is relative contraindication in life-threatening situations
Complications
Myocardial puncture with hemopericardium
Coronary artery laceration
Bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias
Pneumothorax or hemothorax
Hypovolemic hypotension from removing large volumes of fluid
Recurrence (up to 70% using blind technique)
Cardiac arrest
Interpretation of results
When procedure is done without sonographic or fluoroscopic guidance, false-negative aspiration rates are as high as 80% (usually owing to clotted blood in pericardial space or failure to enter pericardial space)
Uncontrolled hypertension can propagate aortic dissection
Ability to control hypertension may influence treatment choice in type B aortic dissection
Conservative management is reasonable only if systolic blood pressure can be controlled and maintained at goal
Less than 140/90 mm Hg (European aortic diseases guidelines) r7
Less than 140/90 mm Hg (patients without diabetes) or less than 130/80 mm Hg (patients with diabetes or chronic renal disease) (American aortic diseases guidelines) r3
Survival rate for aortic dissection during pregnancy is 20% to 30%
Aortic dissection is most common in third trimester or postpartum period
Marfan syndrome is present in up to half of pregnancy-associated cases of aortic dissection
Beyond 30 weeks' gestation, emergency cesarean delivery and subsequent cardiac surgery may be the best option to save the lives of both infant and child bearer
Refer patients with known aortic disease or at risk for aortic disease, including those with associated genetic syndromes or disease, for preconception and genetics counseling
Monitoring
After type A or B dissection and intramural hematoma r3
Obtain follow-up aortic imaging at 1, 3, and 6 months and annually thereafter r42
Use the same imaging modality (CT or MRI) at the same institution if possible, so that similar images of matching anatomic segments can be compared side by side
If stable over long term, consider switch from CT to MRI to decrease radiation exposure
Progressive disease, including aneurysmal degeneration, occurs in 30% of medically managed patients with uncomplicated type B dissection r51
Prognosis
When aortic disease is detected early and treated promptly, chances of survival greatly improve r33r34
Aortic dissection
10-year survival, independent of type of dissection, is 35% to 70% r52
Reoperation is required in up to one-third of patients r52
Type A dissection
Operative mortality has declined; it is now less than 18% r45
Lower operative mortality in hospitals with high case volume versus those with low case volume r7
Patients treated medically have mortality of 50% r52
Type B dissection
Medically treated uncomplicated type B cases have 10% mortality over 5 years r51
Morbidity, including aneurysmal degeneration, occurs in 30% r51
Use of thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for management of complicated type B dissection has greatly increased early survival of these patients r39
Intramural hematoma
May regress, expand, progress to classic dissection, or rupture
Reported mortality has varied by region
In 3 studies, early mortality with surgery (versus without surgery) was as follows: 0% (versus 80%), 8% (versus 55%), and 14% (versus 36%) r53
However, another study primarily from Asian centers showed little difference in outcomes between surgical and medical treatment r53
Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
30-day mortality for surgical treatment is 21% versus 4% for medical treatment, but some case series have reported much higher mortality for medical management r53
Patients with acute penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers are at high risk for aortic-related adverse events and clinically related adverse events within 30 days after onset r10
First-degree relatives of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection
Recent aortic manipulation
Aortic aneurysm
Screening tests
Genetic testing and counseling is recommended for: r3c152
First-degree relatives of a patient with known thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection c153
First-degree relatives of a patient with known genetic mutation associated with thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection; after genetic testing and counseling, only the relatives with the genetic mutation should undergo aortic imaging c154c155
Aortic imaging (choice of test per recommendation of cardiologist or cardiothoracic surgeon consultant) and surveillance is recommended for: r3c156c157c158
Patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm c159c160c161
Baseline imaging of heart and aorta for evidence of bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of aorta, or dilation of ascending thoracic aorta r3
If initial imaging findings are normal and there are no risk factors for aortic dissection, obtain repeated imaging every 5 to 10 years or if otherwise clinically indicated r3
If abnormalities exist, obtain annual imaging or follow-up imaging r3
First-degree relatives of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection to identify those with asymptomatic disease r3c174c175c176
Imaging of second-degree relatives is reasonable if 1 or more first-degree relatives of a patient with known thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection are found to have thoracic aortic dilation, aneurysm, or dissection
In patients with preexisting thoracic aortic aneurysm, counsel on adherence to imaging surveillance protocol r6
In patients with Marfan syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, counsel on restriction from contact sports and other strenuous activities r6r54c178c179
In patients with Marfan syndrome, counsel on the option of prophylactic elective replacement of aortic root r6r55c180
Mariscalco G et al: Aortic centres should represent the standard of care for acute aortic syndrome. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 25(1_suppl):3-14, 201829708034Dmitriew C et al: Barriers and facilitators affecting implementation of the Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Implement Sci Commun. 2(1):60, 202134088362Hiratzka LF et al: 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 55(14):e27-129, 201020359588Bossone E et al: Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 39(9):739-49d, 201829106452Corvera JS: Acute aortic syndrome. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 5(3):188-93, 201627386405European Society of Cardiology: Aortic Disease Guidelines. ESC website. Updated 2016. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Aortic-Diseaseshttps://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Aortic-DiseasesErbel R et al: 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 35(41):2873-926, 201425173340Hagan PG et al: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 283(7):897-903, 200010685714American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Thoracic Aortic Dissection et al: Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with suspected acute nontraumatic thoracic aortic dissection. Ann Emerg Med. 65(1):32-42.e12, 201525529153Yang L et al: Long-term imaging evolution and clinical prognosis among patients with acute penetrating aortic ulcers: a retrospective observational study. J Am Heart Assoc. 9(18):e014505, 202032893719Thrumurthy SG et al: The diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. BMJ. 344:d8290, 201122236596Chang CY et al: Successful management of aortic dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 208(2):e3-6, 201323200711Germain D et al: Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Ann Genet. 47(1):1-9, 200415127738Ohle R et al: Diagnosing acute aortic syndrome: a Canadian clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 192(29):E832-43, 202032690558Su Y et al: Gender-differences in aortic dissection. J Acute Dis. 3(1):10-3, 2014https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-6189(14)60003-2Fibrillin 1; FBN1. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM website. Johns Hopkins University. Updated November 12, 2020. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.omim.org/entry/134797https://www.omim.org/entry/134797Marfan Syndrome; MFS. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM website. Johns Hopkins University. Updated November 27, 2018. Accessed August 10, 2021. https://omim.org/entry/154700https://omim.org/entry/154700Collagen, Type III, Alpha-1; COL3A1. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM website. Johns Hopkins University. Updated March 4, 2019. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.omim.org/entry/120180https://www.omim.org/entry/120180Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Vascular Type; EDSVASC. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM website. Johns Hopkins University. Updated January 27, 2015. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://omim.org/entry/130050https://omim.org/entry/130050Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Receptor, Type II; TGFBR2. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM website. Johns Hopkins University. Updated January 4, 2021. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://www.omim.org/entry/190182https://www.omim.org/entry/190182Loeys-Dietz Syndrome 2; LDS2. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. OMIM website. Johns Hopkins University. Updated July 10, 2017. Accessed August 31, 2022. https://omim.org/entry/610168https://omim.org/entry/610168Girdauskas E et al: Risk of proximal aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: how to address this controversy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 18(3):355-9, 201424336701Losenno KL et al: Bicuspid aortic valve disease and ascending aortic aneurysms: gaps in knowledge. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012:145202, 201223198270Leontyev S et al: Iatrogenic type A aortic dissection during cardiac procedures: early and late outcome in 48 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 41(3):641-6, 201222345184Morello F et al: Development and validation of a simplified probability assessment score integrated with age-adjusted D-dimer for diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes. J Am Heart Assoc. 10(3):e018425, 202133474974Expert Panels on Vascular Imaging and Interventional Radiology et al: ACR appropriateness criteria: thoracic aorta interventional planning and follow-up. J Am Coll Radiol. 14(11S):S570-83, 201729101994Tsutsumi Y et al: Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 9(3_suppl):S32-9, 202031970996Asha SE et al: A systematic review and meta-analysis of D-dimer as a rule-out test for suspected acute aortic dissection. Ann Emerg Med. 66(4):368-78, 201525805111Ohle R et al: Does implementation of a diagnostic pathway for acute aortic syndrome including D-dimer increase the usage of D-dimer and computed tomography? CJEM. 23(4):494-9, 202133825179Murillo H et al: Aortic dissection and other acute aortic syndromes: diagnostic imaging findings from acute to chronic longitudinal progression. Radiographics. 41(2):425-46, 202133646901Scheske JA et al: Computed tomography angiography of the thoracic aorta. Radiol Clin North Am. 54(1):13-33, 201626654389Goldstein SA et al: Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 28(2):119-82, 201525623219Malaisrie SC et al: 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert consensus document: surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 162(3):735-58.e2, 202134112502Sabe AA et al: When to consider deferral of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: a review. Ann Thorac Surg. 111(6):1754-62, 202132882193Tsai TT et al: Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation. 112(24):3802-13, 200516344407Heidenreich PA et al: 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 145(18):e895-e1032, 202235363499Kawabori M et al: Acute aortic syndrome: a systems approach to a time-critical disease. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 30(3):271-81, 201627650339Riambau V et al: Editor's choice--management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 53(1):4-52, 201728081802Nauta FJ et al: Update in the management of type B aortic dissection. Vasc Med. 21(3):251-63, 201627067136Nienaber CA et al: Early and late management of type B aortic dissection. Heart. 100(19):1491-7, 201425092877Bannazadeh M et al: Contemporary management of type B aortic dissection in the endovascular era. Surg Technol Int. 28:214-21, 201627175814Evangelista A et al: Interdisciplinary expert consensus on management of type B intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 47(2):209-17, 201525385219Jánosi RA et al: Thoracic endovascular repair of complicated penetrating aortic ulcer: an 11-year single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 23(1):150-9, 201626511894Preventza O et al: Differential aspects of ascending thoracic aortic dissection and its treatment: the North American experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 5(4):352-9, 201627563548Chiu P et al: Evolution of surgical therapy for Stanford acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 5(4):275-95, 201627563541James D: Pericardiocentesis. In: Fowler GC et al, eds: Pfenninger and Fowler's Procedures for Primary Care. 4th ed. Mosby; 2020:1537-42https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/book/3-s2.0-B9780323476331002301?indexOverride=GLOBAL3-s2.0-B9780323476331002301Criado FJ: Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective. Tex Heart Inst J. 38(6):694-700, 201122199439Tolenaar JL et al: Predicting in-hospital mortality in acute type B aortic dissection: evidence from International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. Circulation. 130(11 suppl 1):S45-50, 201425200055Golledge J et al: Acute aortic dissection. Lancet. 372(9632):55-66, 200818603160Lee SJ et al: Eleven years of experience with the neurologic complications in Korean patients with acute aortic dissection: a retrospective study. BMC Neurol. 13:46, 201323692963Cooper M et al: Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. Vasc Med. ePub, 201627126951Pfeffer MA: Acute aortic dissection. Hosp Med Clin. 1(1):e1-11, 2012https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehmc.2011.10.002Lansman SL et al: Acute aortic syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 140(6 suppl):S92-7; discussion S142-6, 201021092805Yim ES: Aortic root disease in athletes: aortic root dilation, anomalous coronary artery, bicuspid aortic valve, and Marfan's syndrome. Sports Med. 43(8):721-32, 201323674060Treasure T et al: Surgical management of aortic root disease in Marfan syndrome and other congenital disorders associated with aortic root aneurysms. Heart. 100(20):1571-6, 201424986892