ThisiscontentfromClinicalKey

    Diabetes Mellitus, Diagnosis and Classification

    Sign up for your free ClinicalKey trial today!  Your first step in getting the right answers when you need them.

    May.21.2024

    Diabetes Mellitus, Diagnosis and Classification

    Summary

    Key Points

    • Diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by hyperglycemia due to abnormal glucose metabolism. DM is the result of multiple interacting pathophysiologic processes and can be a manifestation of a heterogeneous group of diseases1
    • DM (particularly type 2 DM) is often asymptomatic and is diagnosed on screening laboratory tests, but can present with multiple nonspecific symptoms including polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss, weakness, fatigue, blurry vision, etc.
    • Diagnostic criteria for DM in nonpregnant individuals are based on the following:1
      • HbA1c at least 6.5%
      or
      • Fasting plasma glucose level of at least 126 mg/dL
      or
      • 2-hour plasma glucose level of at least 200 mg/dL during a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test
      or
      • A random (ie, any time of day without regard to time since most recent calorie ingestion) plasma glucose level of at least 200 mg/dL in a person with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis
      • In the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, the diagnosis requires 2 abnormal test results obtained at the same time (eg, HbA1c and FPG) or at 2 different time points (if using samples at 2 different time points, the second test can be either a repeat of the initial test or a different test)
    • The American Diabetes Association classifies DM into 4 main categories30
      • Type 1 DM
      • Type 2 DM
      • Other specific types, which include monogenic DM, genetic defects in insulin action, diseases of the exocrine pancreas (eg, pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, cystic fibrosis), endocrinopathies (eg, Cushing syndrome), drug or chemical induced (eg, glucocorticoid, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy), etc
      • Gestational DM
    • Proper classification of the type or etiology of DM can be challenging but is essential to optimize treatment. DM classification should be determined using a combination of historical findings, physical examination findings, and laboratory testing, when appropriate (eg, islet autoantibodies and C-peptide)

    Alarm Signs and Symptoms

    • Diabetic ketoacidosis
      • A medical emergency characterized by metabolic acidosis due to ketosis and hyperglycemia54
        • Note that "euglycemic" (glucose less than 200 mg/dL) DKA can also occur in the setting of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy, pregnancy, recent insulin use, etc55
      • DKA is not unique to people with T1DM; it can also occur with other types of DM (eg, ketosis prone T2DM, DM following total pancreatectomy)
        • DKA develops in the setting of a precipitating cause, such as infection, myocardial infarction, omission of insulin in a person with T1DM, etc
      • DKA typically develops quickly over a period of hours
      • The following signs and symptoms are nonspecific but can indicate DKA and require urgent attention
        • Altered mentation, rapid and deep respirations (Kussmaul breathing), a "fruity" breath odor (due to exhaled acetone), nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, polyuria, polydipsia, and dehydration (can manifest with decreased skin turgor, dry mucous membranes, tachycardia, low jugular venous pressure, hypotension, etc)
    • Hyperosmolar hyperglycemia state
      • A medical emergency characterized by severe hyperglycemia without ketoacidosis54
      • HHS typically occurs in people with T2DM in the setting of a precipitating cause, such as infection, myocardial infarction, a medication such as systemic glucocorticoid therapy, etc
      • HHS typically develops over several days
      • The following signs and symptoms are nonspecific but can indicate HHS and require urgent attention
        • Altered mentation, focal neurologic signs such as hemiparesis and hemianopia and/or seizures,38,39,40 polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss, and dehydration (can manifest with decreased skin turgor, dry mucous membranes, tachycardia, low jugular venous pressure, hypotension, etc)

    Basic Information

    Terminology

    • DM (diabetes mellitus) is characterized by hyperglycemia due to abnormal glucose metabolism. DM is the result of multiple interacting pathophysiologic processes and can be a manifestation of a heterogeneous group of diseases1
    • Prediabetes is a state of abnormal glucose metabolism and is defined as hyperglycemia that does not meet diagnostic criteria for overt DM

    Background Information

    • The diagnostic criteria for DM are based on (1) glycemic thresholds above which there is an inflection point for the incidence of retinopathy (and other microvascular complications) in multiple population-based studies and (2) the bimodal distribution of FPG (fasting plasma glucose) and 2-h PG (2-hour plasma glucose) during an OGTT (oral glucose tolerance test)2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11
    • People with prediabetes have an increased risk for developing overt DM and its complications, although the risk of developing overt DM is a continuum that extends into the normoglycemic range and is affected by age, weight, and other factors (Table1)12

    Epidemiology

    • Table 1. Diabetes mellitus epidemiology.
      PopulationOccurrence of diabetes mellitus
      DM (all ages)In 2021, 529 million people had DM worldwide, with 96% of cases reported as T2DM (type 2 DM)13
      Globally, the age-standardized prevalence of DM increased from 3.2% in 1990 to 6.1% in 202113
      In the US (United States) in 2021, an estimated 38.4 million people (11.6% of the population) had DM and, of these people, 22.8% of adults were undiagnosed14
      DM (adults only)In the US in 2021, an estimated 38.1 million adults aged ≥ 18 years (14.7% of all adults) had DM. The prevalence of DM significantly increased among adults aged ≥ 18 years from 10.3% during 2001 through 2004 to 13.2% during 2017 through 202014
      In the US in 2021, an estimated 1.2 million new cases of DM were diagnosed among adults aged ≥ 18 years14
      Among adults aged ≥ 18 years in the US, the age-adjusted incidence of diagnosed DM was similar in the years 2000 (6.2 per 1000 adults) and 2021 (5.8 per 1000 adults), and there has been a significant decreasing trend in incidence after 2008 (8.4 per 1000 adults) through 202114
      In the US in 2021, 1.7 million adults aged ≥ 20 years reported having T1DM (type 1 DM), which is 5.7% of all US adults with diagnosed DM14
      Prediabetes (adults only)In the US in 2021, an estimated 97.6 million people aged ≥ 18 years had prediabetes (38.0% of the adult US population). There have been no significant changes in age-adjusted prevalence of prediabetes from 2005 through 2008 to 2017 through 202014
      T1DM (youth only)In the US in 2021, an estimated 352,000 youth < 20 years of age had diagnosed DM, 304,000 of whom had T1DM14
      For youth < 20 years of age, the incidence of T1DM increased from 2002 through 2018. The incidence of T1DM was 22.2 per 100,000 youth (average of 2017/2018 incidence) compared with 19.5 per 100,000 youth (average 2002/20023 incidence), with an adjusted annual percentage change (95% confidence interval) of 2.02 (1.54, 2.49)15
      T2DM (youth only)For youth < 20 years of age, the incidence of T2DM has increased over the period of 2002 through 2018. The incidence of T2DM was 17.9 per 100,000 youth (average 2017/2018 incidence) compared with 9.0 per 100,000 youth (average 2002/20023 incidence), with an adjusted annual percentage change (95% confidence interval) of 5.31 (4.46, 6.17)15

    Etiology and Risk Factors

    Etiology

    • Glucose metabolism is predominantly regulated by pancreatic islet cell function. However, other factors affect fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations, including hepatic insulin extraction, insulin action, glucagon suppression, glucose effectiveness, and the rate of gastric emptying16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23
    • T1DM ultimately arises because of autoimmune destruction of β-cells resulting in severe insulin deficiency1
    • T2DM arises from the interaction of multiple processes. Ultimately, hyperglycemia is the result of an inability of endogenous insulin secretion to overcome the other factors driving hyperglycemia, eg, insulin resistance. Autoimmunity is not a cause of insulin deficiency in T2DM1
    • Other specific types of DM include distinct etiologies such as monogenic DM syndromes, diseases of the exocrine pancreas (eg, pancreatectomy and pancreatitis), etc1

    Risk Factors

    • T1DM develops in genetically susceptible individuals
      • More than 50 loci contribute to T1DM risk, with human leukocyte antigen alleles having a large effect24
      • Environmental factors that can activate the disease process are not well characterized, however, suggested associations include prenatal and postnatal triggers (eg, higher birthweight), enteroviruses, and dietary factors (eg, the timing of introducing cereal into the diet)25
    • Table 2. Asymptomatic adults who should be screened for diabetes mellitus or prediabetes.Adapted from American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(suppl 1):S20-S42.1
      1. People who are overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 or ≥ 23 kg/m2 for Asian individuals) and have one or more of the following risk factors:
      •First-degree relative with DM
      •High-risk race and ethnicity (eg, African, Latino, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander)
      •History of cardiovascular disease
      •Hypertension
      •HDL cholesterol < 35 mg/dL and/or a triglyceride level > 250 mg/dL
      •Polycystic ovarian syndrome
      •Physical inactivity
      •Other conditions associated with insulin resistance (eg, acanthosis nigricans)
      2. People with exposure to high-risk medications (eg, glucocorticoids, statins, thiazide diuretics, second-generation antipsychotic medications)
       •In people who are prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications (eg, olanzapine), consider screening for DM at baseline and 12 to 16 weeks after medication initiation, or sooner if clinically indicated, and annually
      3. People with a history of pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, HIV, etc
      4. People with prediabetes should be tested yearly
      5. People who had gestational DM should have lifelong testing, at least every 3 years
      6. For all other asymptomatic adults, testing should begin at age 35 as the risk of T2DM increases with age
      7. If test results are normal, testing should be repeated at a minimum of 3-year intervals, with consideration of more frequent testing depending on initial results and risk status
    • Table 3. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes in asymptomatic children and adolescents.Adapted from American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(suppl 1):S20-S42.1
      1. Consider screening youth after the onset of puberty or after 10 years of age, whichever occurs earlier, who are overweight (≥ 85th percentile) or obese (≥ 95th percentile) and who have one or more of the following risk factors:
       •Maternal history of DM or gestational DM during the child's gestation
       •Family history of T2DM in a first- or second-degree relative
       •High-risk race and ethnicity (eg, African, Latino, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander)
       •Signs of insulin resistance or conditions associated with insulin resistance (eg, acanthosis nigricans, hypertension, dyslipidemia, polycystic ovarian syndrome, or small-for-gestational-age birth weight)
      2. If numerous risk factors exist, consider screening prior to age 10
      3. If tests are normal, repeat testing at a minimum of 3-year intervals

    Diagnosis

    Approach to Diagnosis

    • A diagnosis of DM is assigned when glucose thresholds are met
    • FPG, 2-h PG during a 75-g OGTT, and HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) are all appropriate tests to diagnose DM and prediabetes1
    • Considerations of test sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, convenience, and confounders may influence which test is used
      • FPG, 2-h PG during a 75-g OGTT, and HbA1c have different sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of DM; eg, a 75-g OGTT is more sensitive than FPG or HbA1c for the diagnosis of DM.1 However, the 75-g OGTT has reduced categorical reproducibility in people without previously diagnosed DM and the within-person coefficient of variation is greater for 2-h PG during a 75-g OGTT than for FPG and HbA1c26,27
      • Due to convenience, FPG and/or HbA1c are often preferred outside of pregnancy. However, because of its increased sensitivity, a 75-g OGTT is often recommended as a screening test for people with certain conditions such as cystic fibrosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, and posttransplantation1
      • Plasma glucose criteria should be used to diagnose DM instead of HbA1c in circumstances where the HbA1c is not an accurate indicator of glycemic control1
        • For example, HbA1c may not reliably represent glycemic control in people who have an altered erythrocyte lifespan such as those with hemolytic anemia28
    • A continuous glucose monitor (which samples interstitial fluid) and a blood glucose meter should not be used to screen for, or diagnose, DM or prediabetes
      • Differences between interstitial, capillary, and venous glucose concentrations are due to physiologic processes and technical differences in the measurement techniques.29 For diagnostic purposes, a blood draw is required

    Approach to Classification

    • Once a diagnosis of DM is made, it is important to classify the etiology as type 1, type 2, gestational, or due to other causes
    • The DM etiology should be determined using a combination of historical findings, physical examination findings, and laboratory testing, when appropriate
    • In some cases, it is difficult or not possible to classify an individual as having type 1 or type 2 DM at the time of presentation; in these individuals further laboratory testing may be required, and often the evolution of the disease over time will allow the etiology to be determined
    • If type 1 DM is suspected in a newly diagnosed adult (eg, unintentional weight loss, ketoacidosis, or prompt/short time to insulin requirement), consider obtaining islet autoantibodies1
    • If an underlying disease is reasonably suspected (eg, Cushing syndrome), specific diagnostic testing to evaluate for those conditions is warranted

    Diagnostic Criteria

    • Diagnostic criteria for prediabetes and diabetes are listed in Tables 4 and 5
    • Table 4. Diagnostic criteria for prediabetes in nonpregnant individuals.Note: For all 3 tests, the risk of developing overt DM is continuous and extends below the lower limit of the range and becomes disproportionately greater at the higher ends of the range.Adapted from American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(suppl 1):S20-S42.1
      HbA1c: 5.7% - 6.4%
      or
      Fasting plasma glucose: 100 - 125 mg/dL (impaired fasting glucose)
      or
      2-h PG during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test: 140 - 199 mg/dL (impaired glucose tolerance)
    • Table 5. Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus in nonpregnant individuals.*Any time of day without regard to time since most recent calorie ingestion.Note: In the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, the diagnosis requires 2 abnormal test results obtained at the same time (eg, HbA1c and FPG) or at 2 different time points. (If using samples at 2 different time points, the second test can be either a repeat of the initial test or a different test.)Adapted from American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(suppl 1):S20-S42.1
      HbA1c ≥ 6.5%
      or
      Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL
      or
      2-h PG ≥ 200 mg/dL during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test
      or
      A random* plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL in a person with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis

    Staging or Classification

    • The American Diabetes Association classifies DM into 4 main categories: T1DM, T2DM, Other specific types, and Gestational DM (Table 6)1
    • T1DM arises due to autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells and typically results in an absolute insulin deficiency
      • A small number of people with T1DM have no evidence of β-cell autoimmunity but are insulinopenic and ketosis prone. In the absence of another cause of DM, these individuals are classified as having idiopathic T1DM1
      • T1DM accounts for 5% to 10% of all DM1
    • T2DM arises in people with both β-cell dysfunction (nonautoimmune progressive decline in insulin secretion results in a relative insulin deficiency) and reduced insulin action (ie, peripheral insulin resistance)18,19,23
      • T2DM is a diagnosis of exclusion, ie, autoimmune β-cell destruction does not occur and the other etiologies of DM (see Table 6) are absent
      • T2DM accounts for 90% to 95% of all DM1
    • Other specific types of DM (eg, monogenic DM, pancreatogenic DM) have clearly defined etiologies (see Table 6)
    • Gestational DM is defined as DM diagnosed in the second or third trimester of pregnancy that was not present prior to conception and is not another type of DM, such as T1DM, that can develop during pregnancy1
    • Table 6. American Diabetes Association Classification of diabetes mellitus.People with any form of DM may require insulin treatment. Treatment with insulin is not used to classify the etiology of DM.Data from American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(suppl 1):S81-90.30
      I. Type 1 diabetes
       A. Immune mediated
       B. Idiopathic
      II. Type 2 diabetes
      III. Other specific types
       A. Genetic defects of β-cell function
        I. Example: monogenic DM (formerly called maturity onset diabetes of the young [MODY])
       B. Genetic defects in insulin action
       C. Diseases of the exocrine pancreas
        II. Examples: pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, neoplasia, cystic fibrosis, and hemochromatosis
       D. Endocrinopathies
        III. Example: Cushing syndrome
       E. Drug or chemical induced
        IV. Examples: glucocorticoids and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
       F. Infections
       G. Uncommon forms of immune-mediated DM
        V. Example: Stiff person syndrome
       H. Other genetic syndromes sometimes associated with DM
      IV. Gestational diabetes mellitus

    Workup

    History

    • The proper classification of the type or etiology of DM can be challenging (Tables 7 and 8). People who develop T1DM in adulthood are often mislabeled as having T2DM31
    • Table 7. Features of diabetes mellitus at the time of diagnosis.Adapted from Masharani U et al. Greenspan's Basic & Clinical Endocrinology. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2018, Table 17-10.
      T1DMT2DM
      Often asymptomatic-++
      Polyuria and polydipsia+++
      Polyphagia with weight loss++-
      Weakness or fatigue+++
      Recurrent blurred vision+++
      Vulvovaginitis or pruritus+++
      AgeOften < 25 yearsTypically > 25 years
      Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) frequencyHigherLower (but can develop)
    • Table 8. Historical findings that suggest a particular type of diabetes mellitus.
      Diabetes mellitus typeHistorical findings that suggest the etiology
      T1DM•Disease onset is possible at any age, but often presents in those < 25 years of age
       ○Children with T1DM often present with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia; approximately 50% have DKA at the time of diagnosis1
       ○Adults can present with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia, but not always; some adults have an indolent disease course (eg, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults)1
      •Family history of T1DM
      •Personal or family history of other autoimmune disease (eg, Celiac disease, Graves disease, etc)
      T2DM•Typically presents in those > 25 years of age, but disease onset is possible at any age, particularly given the increased prevalence of obesity in youth and young adults
      •DKA is less common but can develop; when present, there is typically an identifiable cause such as infection, myocardial infarction, use of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, etc1
      •Family history of T2DM is common
      Other specific types
      Monogenic DM•Development of hyperglycemia at a young age (typically < 25 years old)1
      •Family history of DM in successive generations (suggesting an autosomal dominant transmission)
       ○HNF4A-MODY (MODY1)○May have large birth weight and transient neonatal hypoglycemia1
      ○Sensitive to sulfonylureas
      ○Microvascular and macrovascular complication rates are similar to people with T1DM and T2DM
       ○GCK-MODY (MODY2)○Microvascular complications are rare1
      HNF1A-MODY (MODY3)○Sensitive to sulfonylureas1
      ○Microvascular and macrovascular complication rates are similar to people with T1DM and T2DM
      •Pancreatitis•Even a single episode of acute pancreatitis can result in DM1
      •Concurrent pancreatic exocrine insufficiency
      •Can have higher than expected insulin requirements
      Pancreatic neoplasia•New onset DM in an older adult who is losing weight suggests pancreatic neoplasia as a potential cause32
      •May present with weakness, abdominal pain, and jaundice33
      •Approximately 1% of people diagnosed with DM at age ≥ 50 years are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within the first 3 years of meeting diagnostic criteria for DM34
      Cystic fibrosis•20% of adolescents and 40% to 50% of adults with cystic fibrosis have DM1
      •The risk of cystic fibrosis-related DM increases with age, decreased lung function, and female sex
      Hemochromatosis•Often diagnosed biochemically in an asymptomatic person
      •Chronic fatigue, malaise, arthralgias, and decreased libido can be present35
      •Can present later in women because menstruation reduces iron accumulation
      Cushing syndrome•Weight gain, characteristic changes in physical appearance due to hypercortisolism (see Table 9), decreased libido, menstrual cycle irregularities, depression, recurrent infections36
      Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy•Typically due to programmed cell death‐1/programmed cell death ligand‐1 inhibitors and rarely after cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated antigen-4 inhibitor monotherapy37
      •Timing of DM onset after initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is variable
       ○DM can develop days to years following immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation; the median time to DM diagnosis is 7 to 17 weeks37
      •Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy precipitates autoimmune β-cell destruction37
      •Often rapid onset of severe hyperglycemia; DKA occurs in up to 75% of cases at the time of initial presentation37
      •Insulin dependence develops and is often permanent after DM onset37
      Gestational DM•DM diagnosed in the second or third trimester of pregnancy that was not present prior to conception and is not another type of DM (such as T1DM) that can develop during pregnancy1

    Physical Examination

    • Table 9 provides an overview of physical findings that are indicative of diabetes mellitus etiologies
    • Table 9. Physical examination findings that suggest a specific diabetes mellitus etiology.
      General appearance○People presenting with DKA or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) typically appear ill
      Vital signs and BMI○Hyperglycemia (particularly in the setting of DKA or HHS) can result in dehydration, with tachycardia and hypotension
      People with DKA can have tachypnea
      T1DM, monogenic DM: disease onset is possible at any BMI, but often presents in those with a lower BMI (< 25 kg/m2). Given the increased prevalence of obesity in youth and adults, an elevated BMI should not prevent consideration of autoimmune DM
      T2DM: the vast majority will have an elevated BMI (≥ 25 kg/m2 or ≥ 23 kg/m2 in Asian individuals), often with increased abdominal adiposity
      Neurologic○People with DKA or HHS can have altered mentation that can progress to coma if untreated
      Some people with HHS can develop focal neurologic signs such as hemiparesis and hemianopia and/or seizures38,39,40
      The presence of peripheral neuropathy typically indicates a longer duration of DM
      Eyes○The presence of diabetic retinopathy typically indicates a longer duration of DM
      Thyroid○Autoimmune thyroid disease can present with a goiter and is associated with T1DM41
      Cardiovascular○Hyperglycemia (particularly in the setting of DKA or HHS) can result in dehydration with low jugular venous pressure
      Respiratory○People with DKA can present with rapid, deep respirations (Kussmaul breathing) and their breath can have a fruity odor (due to exhaled acetone)
      Gastrointestinal○People with DKA may develop abdominal pain
      People with hemochromatosis can develop hepatomegaly35
      Skin○Hyperglycemia (particularly in the setting of DKA or HHS) can result in dehydration, with dry mucous membranes and reduced skin turgor
      ○Cushing syndrome manifestations can include facial rounding, plethora, supraclavicular and dorsocervical fat pads, hirsutism, acne, ecchymoses, and wide striae36,42
      ○Hemochromatosis can result in skin hyperpigmentation ("bronze-colored")35
      ○Acanthosis nigricans, characterized by hyperpigmented, velvety plaques typically involving the neck and axillae, is often associated with insulin resistance43
      ○Vitiligo, characterized by depigmented macules or patches, is associated with both T1DM and T2DM44,45
      ○Chronic candidiasis of the skin and mucous membranes is associated with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1, which can include T1DM44
      Musculoskeletal○Cushing syndrome can result in proximal muscle weakness36
      Hemochromatosis can result in joint inflammation35

    Laboratory Tests

    Tests for Diagnosis

    • HbA1c, FPG, and 2-h PG during a 75-g OGTT are all appropriate tests to diagnose diabetes
      • HbA1c
        • HbA1c represents the average blood glucose over the erythrocyte lifespan, which is approximately 120 days, however, it best correlates with mean blood glucose over the prior 8 to 12 weeks46
        • HbA1C range of 5.7% to 6.4% in nonpregnant individuals is indicative of prediabetes1
        • HbA1C of 6.5% or higher in nonpregnant individuals is indicative of diabetes1
      • Fasting plasma glucose
        • Fasting glucose requires no caloric intake for 8 or more hours prior to the blood draw1
        • Fasting glucose in the range 100 to 125 mg/dL is indicative of prediabetes1
        • Fasting glucose of 126 mg/dL or higher is indicative of diabetes1
      • Oral glucose tolerance test
        • A 75-g OGTT entails having a person drink the equivalent of 75 grams of anhydrous glucose dissolved in water. Blood is drawn 120 minutes later (and is typically also collected at baseline prior to consumption of the glucose solution). For the 3 days prior to an OGTT, an individual should consume at least 150 grams of carbohydrate per day1
        • A 2-h PG of 200 mg/dL or higher during a 75-g OGTT is indicative of diabetes1
    • In a person with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random (ie, any time of day without regard to time since most recent calorie ingestion) plasma glucose of 200 mg/dL or higher is diagnostic of DM1
    • Note that, in the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, the diagnosis requires 2 abnormal test results obtained at the same time (eg, HbA1c and FPG) or at 2 different time points. (If using samples at 2 different time points, the second test can be either a repeat of the initial test or a different test)1

    Tests for Classification - Suspected Type 1

    • Islet autoantibodies
      • Islet autoantibodies include those to insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase, islet antigen 2, and zinc transporter 81
        • Insulin treatment can precipitate the development of anti-insulin antibodies. Therefore, if a person has received insulin, do not routinely assess insulin antibodies to establish a diagnosis of T1DM
        • Consider islet autoantibody testing to establish the diagnosis of T1DM in all people who do not have the classic phenotype of T2DM or another DM etiology (eg, cystic fibrosis)
      • T1DM
        • More than 90% of people with T1DM have at least one islet autoantibody47
        • Individuals with clinical features of T1DM who have permanent absolute insulin deficiency (as assessed by C-peptide [connecting peptide]) but negative T1DM antibodies (and no other DM etiology, [eg, monogenic DM, chronic pancreatitis]) are classified as having "type 1B" DM
          • People with "type 1B" represent approximately 5% to 10% of people with T1DM31
        • Adults with DM who have at least one positive islet antibody but have slowly progressive DM with residual insulin secretion (that can persist for years) have a form of T1DM known as latent autoimmune diabetes in adults
      • T2DM
        • If the clinical presentation is consistent with T2DM, it is not necessary to assess for T1DM autoantibodies
    • C-peptide
      • C-peptide is secreted by pancreatic β-cells in equimolar amounts with insulin48
        • Endogenous insulin has a short half-life and, after its secretion into the hepatic portal vein, the liver "extracts" a significant portion of insulin.49 In contrast, C-peptide does not undergo hepatic extraction and has a longer half-life than insulin. Therefore, to assess endogenous insulin secretion, serum C-peptide is a superior test compared with peripheral insulin concentrations
      • A serum C-peptide level is used to assess endogenous insulin secretion and can be tested from the same blood draw used for the serum glucose measurement
      • If the C-peptide level is low and the concurrent glucose is less than 70 mg/dL, consider repeating the test because insulin secretion is expected to be reduced in the setting of hypoglycemia
      • A lower C-peptide level (less than 1.8 ng/mL) is generally consistent with T1DM or monogenic DM, however, it can also occur in people with longer duration T2DM who are treated with insulin31
      • Severe hyperglycemia can suppress insulin secretion, so serum C-peptide should be assessed after recovery (ie, wait to assess C-peptide until 2 weeks after an episode of DKA)31

    Tests for Classification of Genetic Conditions or to Establish Other Causes of Disease

    • Monogenic DM
      • Because the natural history and optimal treatment of monogenic DM differs from T1DM and T2DM, and because diagnosis can indicate possible nondiabetic complications and has implications for family members, if the clinical presentation suggests monogenic DM then genetic testing should be pursued to confirm the diagnosis1
      • HNF4A-MODY (MODY 1)
        • Normal renal threshold for glucose; this can differentiate HNF4A-MODY from HNF1A-MODY
      • HNF1A-MODY (MODY3)
        • Lowered renal threshold for glucose so glucosuria is typically present
      • GCK-MODY (MODY2)
        • Stable, nonprogressive, typically mild fasting hyperglycemia (eg, 100 to 150 mg/dL)
    • Hemochromatosis
      • Screen with serum ferritin and transferrin saturation in individuals with clinical features suggestive of hemochromatosis35
    • Cushing syndrome
      • Screening tests for hypercortisolism include a 24-hour urine free cortisol test, late night salivary cortisol test, and dexamethasone suppression test36
    • Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced DM
      • Individuals will often have very low to absent C-peptide levels and approximately 50% are positive for an islet autoantibody37
      • Despite severe hyperglycemia at diagnosis, HbA1c is often only minimally elevated at the time of DM diagnosis because of the rapid onset of DM37

    Imaging Studies

    • Imaging studies are not routinely performed to classify the etiology of DM, unless there are specific considerations (eg, suspected pancreatic neoplasia)

    Differential Diagnosis

    • Table 10. Differential diagnosis: Hyperglycemia.
      ConditionDescriptionDifferentiated by
      Transient or "stress" hyperglycemia•Hyperglycemia that occurs during acute severe illness (eg, hospitalization for myocardial infarction) in a person without known DM
      •Often due to medications (eg, systemic glucocorticoids) or a "stress response" mediated by counter-regulatory hormones50
      •Hyperglycemia resolves as the clinical condition improves or the culprit medication is discontinued
      •These individuals should be assessed for DM as an outpatient following hospital discharge and are at increased risk of subsequently developing overt DM50
      Transient posttransplant hyperglycemia•Hyperglycemia that develops in the early posttransplant period or develops later due to infection or rejection therapy
      •Often due to medications (eg, systemic glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive therapies) or a "stress response" mediated by counter-regulatory hormones
      •Hyperglycemia is typically transient and resolves within several weeks after transplant
      •In contrast, posttransplant DM should be diagnosed > 45 days after transplant when there is a stable immunosuppression regimen, stable graft function, and no acute infection51
      Gestational DM•Gestational DM is defined as DM diagnosed in the second or third trimester of pregnancy that was not present prior to conception and is not another type of DM, such as T1DM, that can develop during pregnancy1•Diagnostic criteria for gestational DM differ from diagnostic criteria for DM in nonpregnant individuals (see the Special Considerations section)

    Special Considerations

    Pregnant Individuals

    • Diagnostic criteria for gestational DM (Table 11) differ from the diagnosis of DM in a non-pregnant person and include either (1) the "one-step" 75-g OGTT derived from the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria or (2) the "two-step" strategy with a 50-g screen followed by a 100-g OGTT for those who screen positive1
    • Table 11. Screening for and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.Adapted from American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(suppl 1):S20-S42.1
      •"One-step" strategy
       ○Perform a 75-g OGTT, with plasma glucose measured when a person is fasting and at 1 and 2 hours, at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation in a person not previously diagnosed with DM
       ○The OGTT should be performed in the morning after an overnight fast of ≥ 8 hours
       ○The diagnosis of gestational DM is made when any of the following plasma glucose values are met or exceeded:
        ■Fasting: 92 mg/dL
        ■1 hour: 180 mg/dL
        ■2 hours: 153 mg/dL
      •"Two-step" strategy
       ○Step 1: Perform a 50-g glucose load test (nonfasting), with plasma glucose measurement at 1 hour, at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation in a person not previously diagnosed with DM
        ■If the plasma glucose level measured 1 hour after the glucose load is 130 mg/dL to 140 mg/dL, proceed to Step 2
       ○Step 2: Perform a 100-g OGTT when the person is fasting
        ■The diagnosis of gestational DM is made when ≥ 2 (per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; some clinicians use one elevated value52) of the following 4 plasma glucose levels (measured fasting and at 1, 2, and 3 hours during the OGTT) are met or exceeded (Carpenter-Coustan criteria53):
        •Fasting: 95 mg/dL
        •1 hour: 180 mg/dL
        •2 hours: 155 mg/dL
        •3 hours: 140 mg/dL

    Author Affiliations

    Jacob Kohlenberg, MD
    Assistant Professor of Medicine
    Department of Medicine
    Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism
    University of Minnesota

    American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(suppl 1):S20-S42.38078589https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-S002Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(7):1183-1197.9203460https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183Bennett PH et al. Epidemiologic studies of diabetes in the Pima Indians. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1976;32:333-376.986678https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-571132-6.50021-xZimmet P et al. Bimodality of fasting and two-hour glucose tolerance distributions in a Micronesian population. Diabetes. 1978;27(8):793-800.680406https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.27.8.793Rosenthal M et al. Evidence of bimodality of two hour plasma glucose concentrations in Mexican Americans: results from the San Antonio Heart study. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):5-16.3972950https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(85)90003-7Omar MA et al. South African Indians show a high prevalence of NIDDM and bimodality in plasma glucose distribution patterns. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(1):70-73.8112193https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.17.1.70Fan J et al. Bimodality of 2-h plasma glucose distributions in whites: the Rancho Bernardo study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1451-1456.15920067https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.6.1451McCance DR et al. Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentrations as diagnostic methods for diabetes. BMJ. 1994;308(6940):1323-1328.8019217https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6940.1323Davidson MB et al. Relationship between fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin: potential for false-positive diagnoses of type 2 diabetes using new diagnostic criteria. JAMA. 1999;281(13):1203-1210.10199430https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.13.1203Engelgau MM et al. Comparison of fasting and 2-hour glucose and HbA1c levels for diagnosing diabetes. Diagnostic criteria and performance revisited. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(5):785-791.9135943https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.5.785Zhang R et al. The association of retinopathy and plasma glucose and HbA1c: a validation of diabetes diagnostic criteria in a Chinese population. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:4034129.27807545https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4034129American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(suppl 1):S11-S61.20042772https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-S011Collaborators GD. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203-234.37356446https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6National Diabetes Statistics Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed April 10, 2024.https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.htmlWagenknecht LE et al. Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002-18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(4):242-250.36868256https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00025-6Bergman RN et al. Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. J Clin Invest. 1981;68(6):1456-1467.7033284https://doi.org/10.1172/jci110398Shah P et al. Lack of suppression of glucagon contributes to postprandial hyperglycemia in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4053-4059.11095432https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.11.6993Bock G et al. Pathogenesis of pre-diabetes: mechanisms of fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in people with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes. 2006;55(12):3536-3549.17130502https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0319Sathananthan A et al. A concerted decline in insulin secretion and action occurs across the spectrum of fasting and postchallenge glucose concentrations. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;76(2):212-219.21707690https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04159.xBasu A et al. Impaired basal glucose effectiveness in NIDDM: contribution of defects in glucose disappearance and production, measured using an optimized minimal model independent protocol. Diabetes. 1997;46(3):421-432.9032098https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.46.3.421Camilleri M et al. Novel and validated approaches for gastric emptying scintigraphy in patients with suspected gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(7):1813-1815.23695877https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2715-9Camilleri M. Peripheral mechanisms in appetite regulation. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(6):1219-1233.25241326https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.016Kohlenberg JD et al. Differential contribution of alpha and beta cell dysfunction to impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetologia. 2023;66(1):201-212.36112169https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05794-3Robertson CC et al. Genetics of type 1 diabetes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018;50:7-16.29453110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2018.01.006Rewers M et al. Environmental risk factors for type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2016;387(10035):2340-2348.27302273https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30507-4Ko GT et al. The reproducibility and usefulness of the oral glucose tolerance test in screening for diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Clin Biochem. 1998;35(Pt 1):62-67.9463740https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329803500107Selvin E et al. Short-term variability in measures of glycemia and implications for the classification of diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(14):1545-1551.17646610https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.14.1545Beck RW et al. The fallacy of average: how using HbA1c alone to assess glycemic control can be misleading. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(8):994-999.28733374https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0636Pleus S et al. Differences in venous, capillary and interstitial glucose concentrations in individuals without diabetes after glucose load. J Lab Med. 2023;47(3):97-104.https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0013American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(suppl 1):S81-90.24357215https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S081Holt RIG et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021;64(12):2609-2652.34590174https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05568-3Yuan C et al. Diabetes, weight change, and pancreatic cancer risk. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):e202948.32789511https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2948Porta M et al. Exocrine pancreatic cancer: symptoms at presentation and their relation to tumour site and stage. Clin Transl Oncol. 2005;7(5):189-197.15960930https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712816Chari ST et al. Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):504-511.16083707https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.007Pietrangelo A. Hereditary hemochromatosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(2):393-408.e4082.20542038https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.013Nieman LK. Cushing's syndrome: update on signs, symptoms and biochemical screening. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M33-38.26156970https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0464Quandt Z et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor diabetes mellitus: a novel form of autoimmune diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020;200(2):131-140.32027018https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13424Harden CL et al. Hyperglycemia presenting with occipital seizures. Epilepsia. 1991;32(2):215-220.2004625https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1991.tb05247.xLavin PJ. Hyperglycemic hemianopia: a reversible complication of non-ketotic hyperglycemia. Neurology. 2005;65(4):616-619.16116129https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000173064.80826.b8Guisado R et al. Neurologic manifestations of diabetic comas: correlation with biochemical alterations in the brain. Metabolism. 1975;24(5):665-679.805337https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(75)90146-8Warncke K et al. Polyendocrinopathy in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a multicenter analysis of 28,671 patients from the German/Austrian DPV-Wiss database. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):2010-2012.20551013https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0404Kohlenberg J et al. Diffuse wide inflammatory striae as the presenting symptom of Cushing disease in a young adult. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(3):529-530.33673904https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.11.003Das A et al. Acanthosis nigricans: a review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(8):1857-1865.32516476https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13544Bjørklund G et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1: Clinical manifestations, pathogenetic features, and management approach. Autoimmun Rev. 2022;21(8):103135.35690244https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103135Chang HC et al. The association between vitiligo and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(6):1442-1445.31228523https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.022Bunn HF. Evaluation of glycosylated hemoglobin diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1981;30(7):613-617.7250532https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.30.7.613Bingley PJ. Clinical applications of diabetes antibody testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(1):25-33.19875480https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1365Maddaloni E et al. C-peptide determination in the diagnosis of type of diabetes and its management: a clinical perspective. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(10):1912-1926.35676794https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14785Laurenti MC et al. Measurement of pulsatile insulin secretion: rationale and methodology. metabolites. 2021;11(7):409.34206296https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11070409McAllister DA et al. Stress hyperglycaemia in hospitalised patients and their 3-year risk of diabetes: a Scottish retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(8):e1001708.25136809https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001708Sharif A et al. Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(9):1992-2000.25307034https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12850ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(2):e49-e64.29370047https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501Carpenter MW et al. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144(7):768-773.7148898https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0Kitabchi AE et al. Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1335-1343.19564476https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-9032Barski L et al. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Eur J Intern Med. 2019;63:9-14.30910328https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2019.03.014
    Small Elsevier Logo

    Cookies are used by this site. To decline or learn more, visit our cookie notice.


    Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

    Small Elsevier Logo
    RELX Group